I have been quite frustrated with the lack of open discussion concerning children receiving the coronavirus vaccines. So, in an effort to spark conversation, find the nuances in the discussion, and come to a rational conclusion, I am going to make an outlandish claim, argue my position, support it with evidence, and invite you to provide rational counters in the comment section.
Let me lay the foundation for my argument :
My position concerning vaccines, both for adults and children, have always pivoted around freedom of choice and consent. I am not going to argue vaccines in general - rather - specifically the coronavirus vaccine. So, please make sure you remain on topic and refrain from throwing the labels "anti-vaxx", "anti-masker", and/or "conspiracy theorist". I get these emotional insults all the time and they are no longer interesting. Let's focus on the topic at hand. Everyday, I am lambasted online because of my views concerning this "pandemic". I accept it. I have been forthright in my position because there are people in my circle who are suffering greatly because of these lockdowns and they don't have the strength to deal with the backlash. They've supported me in the past and it's time that I help shoulder their burden. Most importantly, the irrational decisions currently being made impacts my nephews, niece, and mentees. Thus, I speak on their behalf as well.
For those who feel comfortable insulting me online, for the sake of this argument, refrain from doing this and let's focus on the bigger picture. Neither of us matter in this context. What matters is the ideas that we are allowing to propagate. Are they helping or hurting children? So, any argument made against my character will remain because I believe in Freedom of Speech, however, I will not engage with the insult because it will only serve as a distraction. So, the foundation has been laid, here's the argument :
If we, as a society, allow children to partake in this medical experiment, then one could also argue that we should allow convicted pedophiles to play in playgrounds and/or become Principals in schools.
Why would I say that?
As someone who has had a difficult and traumatising upbringing, it pains me to see children hurt or in a vulnerable position. Thus, the argument I make above is not done callously.
How did we come to a place where parents would give up their children for a medical experiment?
Firstly, many people trust authority - in an almost fearful way. I am fed up with the, "Well, the experts said", arguments that lead to children being collateral damage. In 1963, Stanley Milgram conducted the Milgram Experiment to measure the willingness of participants "to obey an authority figure who instructed them to perform acts conflicting with their personal conscience". Secondly, as I previously noted in the "Veil of Victimhood", the current social script allows people to make a public claim, run to a safe-space, and censor anyone who disagrees with it. This has been destructive. For example, two irrational claims have been propagated endlessly, of which there is ABSOLUTELY NO SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE. There is no scientific evidence that proves that wearing masks prevent the transmission of coronavirus. Moreover, there is no scientific evidence to prove the claim that asymptomatic people can infect another.
When adults propagate irrational claims, I simply ignore them and allow them to choose their own path. However, I must speak up when irrational behaviours negatively impact the lives of children. The panic-porn of the faulty PCR Tests has caused adults to no longer think critically and they have entrusted their children into the hands of the State. Please do not abdicate responsibility. Please do not use the argument of "we didn't know" when you censor any perspective that makes you uncomfortable. The idea of abdicating responsibility and entrusting your child to any foreign entity, especially pharmaceutical companies with a checkered past, makes as much sense as letting a pedophile babysit your children.
Yet, we see this happening. Moreover, anyone who speaks out against this is labeled with the stigma of being a "conspiracy theorist". How can I be a conspiracy theorist if I am speaking on events that are occurring before our very eyes? How am I a "conspiracy theorist" when all of the links that I share are publicly available?
In Canada, parents were told to isolate their children in a separate room if they tested positive for coronavirus - even if they were asymptomatic. Please read the experiences of parents, portraying the Veil of Victimhood, that I oft discuss in The Symposium.
How about thinking for yourself? How about thinking critically and asking, "How is this impacting the life of my child"? Please, don't play the victim.
Before concluding with my arguments against children being vaccinated, let's once again settle into a rational space. Let's come to a few agreements...
As irrational as the social script is, it has not completely escaped the scientific field of objectivity. Thus, there are agreements we can settle on :
Allow me to be fully transparent :
I am against all coronavirus vaccines because I am frustrated that the WHO has changed the definition of herd immunity. Furthermore, the scientific evidence that has proven that most people have an immune system capable of fighting off the virus has been ignored by the mainstream media. Yet, as much as I stand vehemently against the vaccines promoted to "help" the population, I am even more disgusted by the mRNA "vaccines" being touted as vaccines. The mRNA vaccines are gene therapy. This is not "conspiracy". This is public information. Below is a direct quote from Moderna describing their approach :
Moderna is working to address this underlying cause by providing new instructions to cells so the body can replace these missing or dysfunctional proteins. These instructions are known as messenger RNA or mRNA. Our cells use mRNA to interpret information passed down through our genes and turns this information into proteins that build or regulate our bodies. Moderna’s approach is to give specially engineered mRNA to provide new instructions to the protein-making machinery already inside the cell to treat the underlying cause of inherited metabolic disorders and other diseases.
So, does my discomfort now make sense? Are you able to resonate with my anger?
We are at a stage now where these "vaccines" are being tested on babies and children. People spend their time criticizing my character online - but as I stated before - this is not about me. The Symposium has never been about me. The Symposium has always been about putting every idea forward and taking the best one. The Symposium pivots around the phrase, "When the conversation ends - the bloodshed begins". Most of you spend so much time disparaging me, that you miss the larger picture that I am pointing you to. This is no longer conspiracy. This is happening as we speak. Furthermore, those who are so "courageous" when commenting on my posts decline every opportunity for a nuanced discussion. My phone number has been at the very top of The Symposium since its inception. Here it is again for those who would like to have a public discussion regarding any of the "wild claims" that I make : +4915752481428.
As I have stated from the beginning, if you are an adult and consent to taking these "vaccines", I respect your Freedom of Choice to do so. I, however, will not participate in this mass experiment. I have informed myself on both sides of the issue, and to me, not taking the "vaccine" is the more rational decision. As I have stated before, since I do not give my consent to taking these "vaccines", any form of public pressure, revocation of privileges, and/or shame to coerce me into taking this "vaccine", is a form of rape. Without consent it is rape - no matter the entitiy committing the crime.
To summarise, if you can argue for babies and children taking these "vaccines", after having already seen the adverse effects that it has had on adults - then let's open up the public park for pedophiles and just "see what happens". Aren't we essentially doing the same thing? We do not know the long-term effects that the mRNA gene treatments will have on adults - yet, we're allowing pharmaceutical companies to test children knowing that these companies are more concerned with profit than care. Well, if it is now permissible to abdicate responsibility and allow entities with a nefarious past to "protect our children" because they "know better", then it should also be permissible to allow convicted pedophiles to be Principals in schools.
I'll end my rant here.
As always, the doors of The Symposium are always open for a nuanced discussion.